The plaintiff argues that he was under no obligation to execute the authorizations he received. In support of this proposition, he relies on the decision of Mr. Justice Hinkson, as he then was, in Stead v. Brown, 2010 BCSC 312. That case dealt with the narrow question of whether a plaintiff can be ordered to execute authorizations for the release of records in the hands of third parties. The further question of whether a plaintiff can be compelled to sign an authorization which enables counsel for the defendant to speak to various treating physicians was not addressed directly before me. In addition, I have no knowledge of why, in this case these authorizations were not signed by or on behalf of the plaintiff.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.