Does lack of negligence in the choice of treatment or the manner in which the treatment was performed negate a physician's additional duty to inform the patient of the risks involved in the recommended treatment?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Seney v. Crooks, 1998 ABCA 316 (CanLII):

Lack of negligence in the choice of treatment or the manner in which that treatment is performed does not negate a physician’s additional duty to inform his patient of the risks of proceeding in one way as opposed to another. That a physician can owe more than one duty, and the distinction between such duties, was made clear in Reibl v. Hughes, supra, where Laskin C.J., discussing the need to inform a patient of the risks involved in a recommended treatment, stated at p. 13: The issue under consideration is a different issue from that involved where the question is whether the doctor carried out his professional activities by applicable professional standards. What is under consideration here is the patient’s right to know what risks are involved in undergoing or foregoing certain surgery or other treatment.

Other Questions


Can a medical professional's negligent failure to disclose treatment alternatives and possible diagnoses change the manner of treatment? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a medical doctor have a duty to inform a patient of the possible risks of treatment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the objective test in determining what a reasonable patient would have done if given additional information about the risks of surgery? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for a surgeon to determine whether a patient’s hypothetical choice to refuse treatment should be based solely on the testimony of the patient at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What is a physician's duty to disclose medical information to the patient on request? (Alberta, Canada)
What is a patient's right to be informed of other options for treatment? (Alberta, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is a doctor permitted to refer to a patient’s medical chart containing information that is not relevant to the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a chiropractor need to ask the patient a series of questions about the risks of treatment? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a nurse be terminated for ingesting methadone belonging to a patient after which he continued to treat the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
Is an orthopaedic surgeon required to inform a patient of a less serious alternative procedure which may not have the potential to treat scoliosis? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.