What are the relevant factors for a custody application?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Godin v. Godin, 2010 NSSC 365 (CanLII):

As always, the paramount and only consideration is what parenting arrangement is in the best interests of the children. In Foley v. Foley , 1993 NSSC 62 Goodfellow J. outlined a number of relevant factors to consider in determining the parenting arrangement which is in the best interests of the children: 1. Statutory direction Divorce Act 16(8) and 16(9), 17(5) and 17(6); 2. Physical environment; 3. Discipline; 4. Role model; 5. Wishes of the children ‑ if, at the time of the hearing such are ascertainable and, to the extent they are ascertainable, such wishes are but one factor which may carry a great deal of weight in some cases and little, if any, in others. The weight to be attached is to be determined in the context of answering the question with whom would the best interests and welfare of the child be most likely achieved. That question requires the weighing of all the relevant factors and an analysis of the circumstances in which there may have been some indication or, expression by the child of a preference; 6. Religious and spiritual guidance; 7. Assistance of experts, such as social workers, psychologists, psychiatrists, etcetera; 8. Time availability of a parent for a child; 9. The cultural development of a child; 10. The physical and character development of the child by such things as participation in sports; 11. The emotional support to assist in a child developing self esteem and confidence; 12. The financial contribution to the welfare of a child. 13. The support of an extended family, uncles, aunts, grandparents, etcetera; 14. The willingness of a parent to facilitate contact with the other parent. This is a recognition of the child's entitlement to access to parents and each parent's obligation to promote and encourage access to the other parent. The Divorce Act s. 16(10) and s. 17(9); 15. The interim and long range plan for the welfare of the children. 16. The financial consequences of custody. Frequently the financial reality is the child must remain in the home or, perhaps alternate accommodations provided by a member of the extended family. Any other alternative requiring two residence expenses will often adversely and severely impact on the ability to adequately meet the child's reasonable needs; and 17. Any other relevant factors. The duty, of the court in any custody application is to consider all of the relevant factors so as to answer the question. With whom would the best interest and welfare of the child be most likely achieved? The weight to be attached to any particular factor would vary from case to case as each factor must be considered in relation to all the other factors that are relevant in a particular case. Statutory Direction:

Other Questions


What factors should be considered in an application for custody of a person with mobility issues? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the relevant case law relevant to this question? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the cost and delay of a new application in a different way than a streamlined, more cost-effective application? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a single mother's family status a factor in the refusal of an application to rent an apartment? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a parent's reason for moving to another parent's home not a factor in determining whether or not they were a custodial parent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
When will the court grant an original mobility application against a variation application? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the effect of an application by the Minister of Community Services for permanent care and custody without providing access to the Respondent mother? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is poor mental health a factor in the denial of a permanent care application? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for an application for leave to terminate a relationship where the application is based on the best interest of the child? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Where information is deficient, can an application be adjourned so the parties can provide evidence relevant to section 9(b) and 9(c)? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.