What is the burden of proof for a plaintiff who refuses to undergo surgery that has a 70% chance of success?

Yukon, Canada

The following excerpt is from Minet v. Kossler, 2007 YKSC 30 (CanLII):

In Janiak v. Ippolito, the plaintiff refused to undergo spinal surgery that had a 70% chance of success according to the orthopaedic surgeon. The court concluded that it is for the trial judge to determine if that refusal was reasonable. It further stated that the burden of proof that a plaintiff could reasonably have avoided some of the loss claimed is on the defendant. The onus also includes establishing the extent to which the loss would be avoided or the amount by which the loss would have been reduced. This latter part of the onus on the defendant is certainly an easier task where experts give specific percentages of success or failure in surgery. But this part of the onus must be tempered somewhat where precise quantification is impossible. The Thin Skulled Plaintiff

Other Questions

What is the legal burden of establishing a duty of care? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for success on an issue by issue basis or global basis? (Yukon, Canada)
Is hardship a factor in determining a plaintiff's claim for a reduction in costs? (Yukon, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to compensation for the impairment he sustained in a motor vehicle accident? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden on a defendant carrier in a bus case? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test to apply to a corporate plaintiff? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for "reasonable grounds" in administrative law? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the burden of proving malice in a personal injury case? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether a plaintiff has met the proper legal test? (Yukon, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to full indemnity and special costs as indemnity? (Yukon, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.