The onus is on the Law Society to prove professional misconduct on a balance of probabilities. The evidence “must be scrutinized with care” and “must always be sufficiently clear, convincing and cogent to satisfy the balance of probabilities test” (Law Society of BC v. Schauble, 2009 LSBC 11, at para. 43).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.