What is the burden of proving a plaintiff’s failure to mitigate?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Harmati v. Williams, 2016 BCSC 2199 (CanLII):

The onus in proving a plaintiff’s failure to mitigate falls on the defendants who must prove: (a) there were steps that the plaintiff could have taken that might have avoided or reduced the loss; (b) those steps were reasonable; and (c) the amount by which those steps would have avoided or reduced the loss. (Frers v. De Moulin, 2002 BCSC 408 at para. 217)

Other Questions


What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff’s considered decision not to undergo spinal fusion surgery is a failure to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff took steps that could have been taken to mitigate their loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a defendant failed to mitigate for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a plaintiff failed to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff’s failure to pursue recommended medical treatment contributed to their loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff's failure to follow the advice of doctors with respect to treatment is reasonable or unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's failure to lose weight and increase her fitness level a failure to mitigate in circumstances where her injuries are not permanent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that they were injured as a result of negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of reducing damages on the basis of failure to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff acted unreasonably in her actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.