What are the consequences of a claim against an unsuccessful defendant for risk premium for financial risk?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Reaume v. Unifund Assurance, 2007 CanLII 37360 (ON SC):

In an overview, the result of a claim against an unsuccessful defendant for a risk premium for financial risk is, in effect, a separate head of damages as opposed to costs which an unsuccessful defendant would reasonably be expected to pay. I agree with and regard Walker v. Ritchie, as binding notwithstanding the recent changes to the Ontario scheme as in the Rules of Practice quoted. In the result, there will be no premium allowed or no special award made.

Other Questions


Is a motion for a stay of execution pending a counter-claim, cross-claim and third party claim valid? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the consequences of a plaintiff asserting unsuccessful allegations of fraud against a defendant? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a plaintiff escape the adverse costs consequences of an unsuccessful claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's new statement of claim that describes the nature of their employment contract relevant to a whistleblowing claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have a legally tenable claim against the proposed defendant? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for adding a defendant to a claim where the limitation period has not yet expired? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a claim against a defendant in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to succeed in her claim against a defendant? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the fact that a tenant never raised the issue of their possessory claim until 1991 affect the validity of the claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has an interest in extending the limitation period of a claim? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.