Is there an omission of material facts that may have changed the mind of the granting judge?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kostyniuk & Bruggeman Barristers, 2009 CanLII 23873 (ON SC):

The real issue before me is whether there was an omission of any material facts that may have changed the mind of the granting judge. Coupey v. Hamilton Police Services [2005] O.J. No. 2223. I have not been persuaded by the arguments of the defendants that there was.

Other Questions


Can the court use the application procedure under rule 14.05(h) of the Rules of Civil Procedure to determine whether there will be any material facts in dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing there are no material facts in dispute? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the test for setting aside an ex parte order where there has been a failure to disclose all material facts? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a trial judge made a material error? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What material facts must be disclosed to a judge on an ex parte motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any basis to interfere with a trial judge's conclusion that there is no cause of action based on the rule in Rylands v Fletcher? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where a trial judge said that mental illness excuse guilt if you find there is guilt? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where the learned trial judge found there was no evidence of intent to defraud? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When there is a trial by judge and jury, what is the role of the judge in determining defamatory words? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a statement of claim that there has been unjust enrichment with no explanation of why the facts might justify the claim? (Alberta, Canada)