What is the test for an offer to settle procedure under Rule 37?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Martel v. Peetoom, 1996 CanLII 8527 (BC SC):

18 In a case like this, where there are two separate actions, there are practical reasons why the operation of the offer to settle procedure under Rule 37 must be confined to the proceeding in which it is used. These reasons are canvassed in Morrison v. Pankratz. These realities, however, should not cloud the recognition that the plaintiff's offer should have been accepted by the defendant.

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted r. 9-1(6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Civil Procedure in determining whether to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any evidence that an offer to settle was wholly achieved prior to the delivery of the offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offer that does not comply with Rule 37 B constitute an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an offer to settle an action under Rule 9-1(5)(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure available to a litigant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the double costs awarded to a defendant using an offer to settle procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an initial and comprehensive settlement offer made by the respondent and a revised offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does Rule 37B of the Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to double costs under Rule 37 of the Rules of Civil Procedure if it makes a single offer to settle two separate actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant make a single post-offer damages offer under Rule 37B of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.