What is the standard of conduct of an attesting officer in giving evidence at a criminal trial?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Dennis James Oland v. R, 2015 NBQB 243 (CanLII):

Our Supreme Court has said it best: … The informant’s obligation is to present all material facts, favourable or not. Concision, a laudable objective, may be achieved by omitting irrelevant or insignificant details, but not by material non-disclosure. This means that an attesting officer must avoid incomplete recitations of known facts, taking care not to invite an inference that would not be drawn or a conclusion that would not be reached if the omitted facts were disclosed. (R v. Morelli, supra, at para. 58)

Other Questions


Is interference justified on the basis that the trial judge misapprehended the evidence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is there any evidence that a cul-de-sac was established to give access to six new lots? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the relevance of the evidence at trial for possession of stolen property? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of review for errors attributed to a trial judge? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the difference between the original evidence and the current evidence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that the evidence presented at trial was reasonable diligence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can evidence obtained in a manner that infringed any rights guaranteed by the Charter be excluded from the trial? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an arbitrator's decision? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the impact of the pleadings on the outcome of the trial? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the evidence supporting the allegation that there was no safe avenue of escape for the accused in the assault case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.