It is clear that the normal rule that costs follow success applies in custody cases: Gabb v. Gabb, 2001 MBCA 19. There needs to be some justification or special reason to deprive a successful litigant of his or her reasonable costs. The onus is on the unsuccessful party to convince the court that the factors set out in Queen’s Bench Rule 57.01(1) and those set out in the case law should override the general principle: Rolls v Whittaker-Rolls, 2006 MBQB 67.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.