Nonetheless, we would dismiss the motion to file fresh evidence. In our view, the evidence serves only to confirm the appellant’s rehabilitative prospects, the evidence of which was already before the trial judge. As such, it does not meet the test set out in R v. Palmer, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.