What is the mitigation test for medical malpractice?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Fowler v Ford, 2021 BCSC 324 (CanLII):

The mitigation test is a two-part subjective/objective test: Gregory v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2011 BCCA 144 at para. 56. The test asks: 1. Would a reasonable patient, having all the information that the plaintiff possessed, ought to have undergone the recommended treatment? 2. If so, to what extent would the plaintiff’s damages have been reduced by that treatment?

Other Questions


Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the duty of disclosure of medical malpractice in medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BCSC treated records of medical malpractice in medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
When considering a patient's medical history, is it possible for the medical malpractice review to consider a single file? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of mitigation in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the general rule and exceptions to standard medical practice in medical malpractice? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have medical and/or legal opinions been interpreted in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by the Canadian Medical Association in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care of the medical staff in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.