What is the position of the two main parties in the House of Commons on the assumption that a Minister of State should be required to provide a statement of support to support a Ministerial assumption?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Quraishi v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 272 (CanLII):
Which party’s position, if either, is correct? The starting principle is that a ministerial assumption is presumed correct unless the taxpayer appellant has put forward at least a prima facie case establishing otherwise. See House v. R., 2011 FCA 234, paras. 30-32.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for "common common law common common law" in a class action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a Minister's Minister of Employment and Immigration (Minister of Employment & Immigration) need to be appointed a Minister of Justice? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is the panel’s decision that a Minister of Justice should not be allowed to appoint a Minister for Employment and Immigration (e.g. Minister of Work and Pensions) to the Minister of Employment and Training (Employment), or is the panel's decision patently unreasonable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the Boden requirement of a showing of unforeseen change apply to a child support proceeding when the parties' agreement contains no child support provisions? ("New York", United States of America)
Can a Minister of Employment and Immigration (minister of employment and immigration) bring a claim against the Minister of Justice for Ministerial Responsibility for Immigration and Refugee Protection Division in a federal civil case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does Section 1983 of the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to provide a remedy for tortfeasors who have been deprived of their contractual rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to respond to a Defendant's statement stating that the material facts contained in that statement are to be admitted as a matter of law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party is in a position where the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the presumption that a person who makes a statement of intent to injure another person be liable for damages if that statement contains two statements of intent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a common law marriage valid in a state that does not recognize common law marriages? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
