In what circumstances will a word be interpreted in its ordinary, grammatical sense?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Quinn Enterprises Ltd. v. Andros Enterprises Ltd., 1983 CanLII 2123 (SK QB):

In the construction of statutes, words must be interpreted in their ordinary, grammatical sense unless that would lead to absurdity or some repugnance or inconsistency with the rest of the statute, in which event the sense of the word may be modified to avoid the difficulty (see Grey v. Pearson (1857), 10 E.R. 1216).

Other Questions


What is the test for interpretation of the words “to be construed in one sense only” in the words of a statute? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a matrimonial domicile acquired by residence as distinct from domicility in the ordinary sense give any jurisdiction to divorce in English law? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have words like “my surviving children” been interpreted in a will and how have they been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the "ordinary rule” in the context of a sale of land? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge be bound by a uniform interpretation of a statute? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a change in circumstances constitute a material change in the child’s circumstances to warrant removal from the only home he had ever known? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for using both a technical and ordinary sense of words in a bylaw or bylaw? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Rule of Civil Procedure been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a default judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances can a plaintiff recover damages for injuries sustained by a bull? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a mortgagee permitted to sell or dispose of the goods in the ordinary course of business? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.