Can a Master's order denying an independent medical examination raise questions that may be vital to the final issue in the case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Barbosa v. Castillo, 2010 BCSC 212 (CanLII):

A decision to deny a defendant the opportunity to have an independent medical examination conducted of the plaintiff can raise questions that are vital to the final issue in the case. In Belke v. Bennett, 2006 BCSC 536, Mr. Justice Barrow provided the following helpful approach at para. 5: If the Master's order amounts to a refusal, whether in whole or in part, of an application to have the plaintiff submit to an independent medical examination, it may deprive the defendant of discovering evidence necessary for a full examination of the plaintiff's claim or of a defence advanced. It is in that sense that a decision may be said to go to an issue vital to the trial. [...] If, on the other hand, the Master's order simply sets terms on which the independent medical examination is to be conducted or directs that such an examination not be performed by a particular professional, the defendant is not deprived of potential evidence, and the order cannot be characterized as going to an issue that may be vital to a final issue at the trial.

Other Questions


Can a Master's Order denying an independent medical examination of a plaintiff raise questions that may be vital to the final issue in the case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a Master's decision on interim custody and access matters purely interlocutory or raise questions which are vital to the final issue in the case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge or master have discretion to permit recording of a Rule 30 independent medical examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Under Rule 30(1) of the Rules of Court, can an independent medical examination be ordered for the purposes of determining whether an individual is fit for purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any new question or matter that should be the subject of an inquiry or an independent medical examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Under Rule 30(1) of the Rules of Court, can an independent medical examination be ordered for the purposes of determining whether an individual is fit for trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a Part 7 examination constitute a first independent medical examination for the purposes of tort? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff set aside an order dismissing her claim for failure to attend a case management hearing and comply with case management orders? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a final order be made where the final order is intended to achieve a specific set of objectives? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.