In that case his Lordship went on to consider various cases where building code requirements had not been met. Those cases are of course distinguishable from the case at bar because as noted by Errico J. in Jakubke v. Sussex Group (1993), 31 R.P.R. (2nd) 193 (B.C.S.C.) where his Lordship concluded that non-conformity with height requirements in the building code was a latent defect because “. . . the defect was not one that arose by necessary implication from something visible to the eye.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.