Is a medical-legal report too long?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hamo v. Khan, 2010 BCSC 205 (CanLII):

In view of the length of the reports in question (82 pages for the first report and 26 pages for the second) we might well pine for the days when a mere 13-page medical-legal report was found to be excessive due to its unnecessarily long recitation of medical history: see Hall v. Strocel, supra.

Other Questions


Is there any evidence that a plaintiff has sustained a long-term, long term chronic pain for long periods of time? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the adjudicator reviewed the officer's report, affidavits and officer’s report? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an applicant and respondent at a summary trial rely on expert reports, examinations for discovery, interrogatories, use of admissions, and expert reports? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of having a long-term, long term marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant in a personal injury action make use of a medical report and clinical report obtained from an earlier and by then settled wrongful dismissal action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a report critiquing a section 211 report be inadmissible? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party have to obtain a report from a doctor before obtaining the report from that doctor? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the requirement to deliver an expert report within 84 days (or a response report in 42 days) be dispensed with? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff who has been receiving treatment for a long-term brain injury for the last year or so contact with her doctor with reports that nothing has changed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the late filing of an expert report under the BCSC's Disjunctive Expert Report Rule permit late filing? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.