In Chernoff v. Chilcott (supra) and the cases which it considered, the issue to be determined was whether an "owner" of a ship who was at the time of the alleged negligence also "acting in the capacity of master" could be entitled to the more generous limitation provision applying to a "master". Obviously no issue of consent could arise in such a case. The "functional analysis" undertaken had to do with the factual question of whether the negligent action was undertaken by the owner in his capacity functioning as owner or in his capacity functioning as master.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.