How is liability apportioned between the parties in a motor vehicle accident?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Seres v. Ramirez, 2006 ABQB 846 (CanLII):

In a case where the negligence of both parties contributes to an accident, making it impossible to establish differing degrees of fault, liability ought to be apportioned 50/50: Jordan v. Turpin, [1999] A.J. No. 1130 [ABCA]. Here, however, it is not impossible to establish degrees of fault.

Other Questions


How have courts apportioned the 80-20 split between liability and apportionment of liability in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the burden of proof against the Registrar of Motor Vehicles apply to motor vehicle accident claims? (Alberta, Canada)
How is liability apportioned between two defendants in a motor vehicle accident for chronic pain syndrome? (Alberta, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a plaintiff not be liable for failing to warn the driver of the vehicle that there is no evidence that such warnings would have prevented the accident? (Alberta, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case where the victim is not dead but still exists, is there any case law that supports the presumption that the accident victim’s death is not an accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a tortfeasor have a right to recover damages from a third party who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law where a third party has been found to be liable for a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the limitation of liability of a defendant in a motor vehicle accident case? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a third party claim in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident where there may be multiple causes of damage or injury, can a defendant escape full liability? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.