Is a finding of professional misconduct for failing to co-operate with investigations in 2016 and 2017 relevant?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Law Society of Ontario v. Diamond, 2022 ONLSTH 28 (CanLII):
The Law Society’s position is that the finding of professional misconduct for failing to co‑operate with investigations in 2016 and 2017 is not relevant misconduct: Law Society of Upper Canada v. Diamond, 2017 ONLSTH 191.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What relevance does relevance exist in the context of relevance? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current standard of conduct for a lawyer who has been found guilty of misconduct by a panel of the Law Society of Upper Canada for failing to comply with the rules of professional conduct? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the court make a finding of fact or finding of not finding fact in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for a finding of failing to co-operate with an investigation? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will professional investigators or evaluators interview a child who has been accused of sexual assault? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an employer be held liable for failing to properly investigate a complaint of harassment and discrimination? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a fine for gross misconduct sufficient to deter future misconduct? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for reckless dismissal, flagrant misconduct and/or deliberate misconduct? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a Deputy Judge erred in failing to find that the dispute was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the OLRB or the labour arbitrator? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for professional misconduct and conduct unbecoming? (Ontario, Canada)
