Is there a duty to warn of the dangers of placing a hand between the tongue-guides?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Roy v. Doucet, 2005 NBCA 84 (CanLII):

Moreover, the law is rightly allergic to the imposition of a duty to warn one’s reasonably intelligent “neighbour” (see Donoghue v. Stevenson, 1932 CanLII 536 (FOREP), [1932] A.C. 562 (H.L.)) against dangers that are self-evident. There is no evidence that the appellant was anything other than reasonably intelligent, and the slight risk posed by placing a hand between the tongue-guides was obvious.

Other Questions


What is the test for placing a child in the care of a social worker? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can a medical report be considered opinion evidence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
How has an employer been successful in imposing discipline on an employee who was found with a marijuana cigarette in his cigarette package? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for damages for breach of contract for the purchase and sale of real estate? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the reasonable notice period for an employee? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is a verdict under appeal based on credibility or not? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the impact of a denial of a licence to practice medical malpractice? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard for fairness in a summary judgment case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for the defence of duress? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is there a compelling reason to entertain the "occupation rent" claim made by the petitioner against the respondent? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.