What is the test for a plaintiff to sue the Church of Scientology?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lee v. Scott, 2001 BCSC 1281 (CanLII):

The law presumes that the words were spoken in good faith. The onus is on the plaintiff to prove malice. Without such proof, the defendants are protected from liability by the privilege of the occasion. See Hill v. Church of Scientology, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130 (S.C.C.).

Other Questions


In what circumstances can a plaintiff sue the Church of Scientology for defamation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for punitive damages in a case brought by a plaintiff against the Church of Scientology? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are punitive damages available to a plaintiff in a case brought by the Church of Scientology? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a claim for general damages in a sexual assault case brought by a plaintiff against a Church of Scientology member? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be awarded damages from the Church of Scientology for breach of the terms of an oath of trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a judge finds that a plaintiff has violated a plaintiff’s human rights in a civil case, does this rule apply? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of aggravated damages in a personal injury action brought against the Church of Scientology? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be treated as a thin-skulled plaintiff for the purpose of damage assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a need for physical or temporal proximity between a plaintiff and plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to an award for costs of future care for a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.