A succinct summary of those principles is in Hall v. Hebert, 1993 CanLII 141 (SCC), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 159 at 176 per McLachlin J.: The question that the law asks is whether an injured party suffered a recognized sort of injury, at the hands of someone who owed this party a duty of care, and who caused reasonably foreseeable damage by falling below the standard of care that the law imposes.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.