What is the law on adjournment when a witness fails to attend to give evidence?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Collinge, 2015 BCPC 111 (CanLII):
The law with respect to what a judge ought to consider when a witness does not attend to give evidence is set out in Darville v. The Queen, [1956] S.C.J., S.C.J., No. 82. That is the leading case and continues to be the leading case on the conditions that must ordinarily be met in order to entitle a party to an adjournment where a witness is unavailable: (a) the absent witness must be a material witness in the case; (b) the party who is applying for the adjournment must not have been guilty of laches or neglect in omitting to endeavour to procure the attendance of the witness; and (c) there must be a reasonable expectation that the witness can be procured at the future time to which it is sought to put off the trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a lawyer who fails to put a proposition of evidence to a witness in cross-examination in a civil matter be held liable to sue the witness in a criminal case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a personal trainer have been found to have failed to mitigate damages for failing to attend physiotherapy? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the evidence that a strata issued a fine for failing to notify an individual of a violation of section 135.17 of the BC Strata Plan by failing to respond to a letter sent to the owner? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a claimant who has failed to provide income tax returns, other specific evidence of her financial circumstances, or evidence that her health disabled her from working, prove need? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adverse inference in a case where a party fails to call a witness who has material evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of failing to call a witness who might have pertinent evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is evidence of a statement made to a witness by a person who is not himself called as a witness admissible? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a adjudicator's reasoning be manifestly flawed where the adjudicator failed to consider the evidence supporting the findings of two witnesses? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who has not produced evidence in favour of their position, or has no reasonable explanation for failing to call the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of failing to call witnesses who may have important medical evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
