What is the test for taking a recommended treatment to reduce damages in a personal injury action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Haug v Funk, 2022 BCSC 378 (CanLII):

The law requires a plaintiff to take reasonable steps to reduce her damages, including by taking recommended treatment. Whether a plaintiff acted reasonably is a question of fact: Gilbert v. Bottle, 2011 BCSC 1389 at paras. 201–202.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have defence counsel in a personal injury action been advised to take walks as part of their rehabilitation from soft tissue injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, is a plaintiff entitled to damages for not following the recommendations of their doctors? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of personal experiences on the assessment of non-pecuniary damages in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.