What is the test for a change in custody or access order?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Choudry v. Cater, 2018 ONCJ 238 (CanLII):

Paragraphs 49 and 50 of Gordon v. Goertz contains a summary of the aforementioned principles. I quote from it verbatim as follows: 49 The law can be summarized as follows: 1. The parent applying for a change in the custody or access order must meet the threshold requirement of demonstrating a material change in the circumstances affecting the child. 2. If the threshold is met, the judge on the application must embark on a fresh inquiry into what is in the best interests of the child, having regard to all the relevant circumstances relating to the child's needs and the ability of the respective parents to satisfy them. 3. This inquiry is based on the findings of the judge who made the previous order and evidence of the new circumstances. 4. The inquiry does not begin with a legal presumption in favour of the custodial parent, although the custodial parent's views are entitled to great respect. 5. Each case turns on its own unique circumstances. The only issue is the best interest of the child in the particular circumstances of the case. 6. The focus is on the best interests of the child, not the interests and rights of the parents. 7. More particularly the judge should consider, inter alia: (a) the existing custody arrangement and relationship between the child and the custodial parent; (b) the existing access arrangement and the relationship between the child and the access parent; (c) the desirability of maximizing contact between the child and both parents; (d) the views of the child; (e) the custodial parent’s reason for moving, only in the exceptional case where it is relevant to that parent’s ability to meet the needs of the child; (f) disruption to the child of a change in custody; (g) disruption to the child consequent on removal from family, schools, and the community he or she has come to know. 50 In the end, the importance of the child remaining with the parent to whose custody it has become accustomed in the new location must be weighed against the continuance of full contact with the child's access parent, its extended family and its community. The ultimate question in every case is this: what is in the best interests of the child in all the circumstances, old as well as new? C. There Have Been Material Changes In Circumstances Since Murray J.’s November 6, 2013 Order

Other Questions


Can a court vary a custody and access order where the child spends the preponderance of time resident with the custodial parent, with access to the non-custodial parent for a shorter time period? (Ontario, Canada)
What type of change is sufficient to change a custody order? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge order custody to the mother, specified access to the father and non-removal order? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court order a custody and access order in the best interests of both parties? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a risk of a child dangling like a yo-yo at the end of their parents' string if a judge grants an interim order to change custody on an interim motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a court to change access order to a child with asthma? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test to vary an interim order as to custody or access? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the condition precedent to a change in custody or access? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for making a specified access order in a custody dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a court to vary a custody and access order? (Ontario, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.