An applicant for a variation order in cases such as this (sometimes referred to as “mobility rights cases”) must meet the threshold of demonstrating a material change in the circumstances affecting the child of the nature of those set out in Gordon v. Goertz, 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27. It is also trite law that in custody and access matters, the best interests of the child is the paramount consideration.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.