What is the test for unjust enrichment in the law of constructive trust?
Yukon, Canada
The following excerpt is from Daws v. Buckler, 2003 YKSC 60 (CanLII):
The law of constructive trust is based upon the equitable concept of unjust enrichment. As stated in Peter v. Beblow, 1993 CanLII 126 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980, para. 3, an action for unjust enrichment requires three elements: 1. an enrichment; 2. a corresponding deprivation; and 3. the absence of a juristic reason for the enrichment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any error of law in a judge's analysis of the doctrine of unjust enrichment? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for finding a claimant entitled to a remedy for unjust enrichment? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the elements of a cause of action in unjust enrichment? (Yukon, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the constructive trust remedy in a family law case? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for constructive dismissal in Canada? (Yukon, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to full indemnity and special costs as indemnity? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for a constitutional duty to consult in this treaty? (Yukon, Canada)
Is solicitor-client privilege an important component of the Canadian legal system? (Yukon, Canada)
How has custody of a child been determined in a separation case? (Yukon, Canada)
Does qualified privilege apply to statements made by an employee to a supervisor? (Yukon, Canada)
