When is a police officer unlawfully on a premises not acting in the course of their duty?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v D.L.M, 2018 BCSC 1247 (CanLII):

The law is well settled that a police officer unlawfully on premises is not acting in the course of their duty, at least vis-à-vis the person lawfully in possession and that resistance offered in response to what the police may do in such an occasion is not obstruction, although it may be another offence: Davis v. Lisle, [1936] 2 K.B. 434.

Other Questions


Is an unidentified police informer acting as an agent of the police when she entered the premises of two accused? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it possible for a retired police officer to return to the police force where he worked as a community support officer because of his back pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that a director, officer or employee was acting within the course of employment preclude a claim in negligence against the individual respondents personally? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a police officer be ordered to produce a certificate that the adjudicator would like to compel the officer to produce? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it improper for a police officer to delay making a call to legal counsel while the accused is being questioned at a police station? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the duties of a police officer in common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a police officer engage in a police pursuit when he has the opportunity to follow a stolen vehicle using an unmarked car? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a police officer have a duty on the accused to advise the accused of a criminal offence of not seeking counsel for a second time when new circumstances arise indicating that the accused is a suspect for a different crime than was the first warning? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court review a decision by a police officer under section 90.3 of the Criminal Code when the officer applied the wrong test? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an exception to the London Drugs principle where a director, officer or employee was acting within the course of employment and the corporation is vicariously liable for his negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.