In a discrimination case where a complainant names as a respondent a lawyer who acted for another lawyer in the course of a discriminatory event, is the complainant required to waive solicitor-client privilege?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Metcalfe v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 882 and others (No. 9), 2005 BCHRT 512 (CanLII):

On further reflection, it seems to me inevitable that such disputes will arise in any case where a complainant names as a respondent a lawyer who acted for another respondent in the course of allegedly discriminatory events. In order for either or both of those respondents to give evidence to defend themselves against such allegations, the client will be forced to waive the right to solicitor-client privilege which would otherwise cloak their confidential communications. As I discussed in detail in Metcalfe (No. 6), the law is assiduous in its protection of solicitor-client privilege. As stated by Dickson J. in Solosky v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 9 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821 at p. 839, “the right to communicate in confidence with one’s legal adviser is a fundamental civil and legal right, founded upon the unique relationship of solicitor and client”. If the law were to fail to be vigilant in its protection of solicitor-client privilege, parties, who might otherwise seek the benefit of legal counsel, might be reluctant to seek and take legal advice, for fear that their communications with counsel would be admissible in future proceedings. This would be to the benefit of neither the individuals involved nor the legal system as a whole.

Other Questions


In what cases have the courts restrained a lawyer from acting where the lawyer has previously acted jointly for another lawyer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an implied waiver of privilege where a party waives privilege but takes a position in relation to privileged materials that is inconsistent with maintaining privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a complainant's feelings that a respondent's conduct was discriminatory form the basis for an inference of discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can counsel acting on behalf of the respondent to an application for summary judgment take the second course described in Placer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does absolute privilege apply to statements made by a lawyer in the course of representing a client? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any evidence that the privilege holder has a voluntary intention to waive the privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the law society of BC dealt with professional misconduct claims against a lawyer who incurred debts to another lawyer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a service provider required to disclose the name and location of a residential home and the name of the service provider? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a law firm representing the respondent in a personal injury action be restrained from acting for the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event occurred at the same time as an actual event? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.