What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has met the onus of proof for the causation question?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Blatz v. Impact Energy Inc, 2009 ABQB 506 (CanLII):
As a result, this judgment will start with a brief discussion of the applicable law, followed by an examination of pertinent facts, and then a detailed analysis of the expert evidence. This leads to a determination of whether the plaintiffs have met the onus of proof in relation to the causation question, and then to the quantification of any damages. The Law 1. Rylands v. Fletcher
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has met the onus of proof? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has made all reasonable efforts to establish the identity of the driver? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether a question of mixed fact and law is correct or palpable and overriding error? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a written contract is a question of law? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a tortfeasor is liable for a plaintiff's injuries? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to damages from an event that may happen in the future? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a duly qualified medical professional can examine a plaintiff pursuant to Rule 217? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an occupier of a building is liable for damage caused to a plaintiff's property by an electrical shock? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in her claim for wrongful dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a third party has been negligent in causing the injury of a plaintiff by accident? (Alberta, Canada)
