What is the consequence of a jury finding an appellant guilty of child luring under 16?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Dare, 2021 ONCA 327 (CanLII):

The jury found the appellant guilty on all three counts. The trial judge stayed the convictions under ss. 172.1(1)(b) (child luring under 16) and 286.1(2) (communicating to obtain sexual services from a minor) pursuant to Kienapple v. R., 1974 CanLII 14 (SCC), [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729.

Other Questions


Can a convicted child luring offender plead guilty in Canada to all charges arising out of his activities of child sexual exploitation and child pornography to the victim's parents in Canada? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consequence of a jury finding an appellant guilty of two counts of communication to obtain sexual services from a minor? (Ontario, Canada)
If the child is a full-time student at school, is the child's income sufficient to qualify for child support? (Ontario, Canada)
When a child is away from home for 8 months of the year, does the court have to determine child support for the child over the age of 18? (Ontario, Canada)
If a child takes a gap year before starting secondary education, can that child remain a child of the marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the court make a finding of fact or finding of not finding fact in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
How would a respondent receive credit for child support paid for one child as a set off against a retroactive amount paid for the other child? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for finding a child in need of child protection? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an appellate court substitute a trial judge’s findings of fact or mixed findings of law with its own? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court grant a motion to terminate child support on the basis that the child is no longer a child of the marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.