What is the role of a judge in determining the quality or reliability of evidence at trial?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Persaud, 2017 ONSC 7007 (CanLII):

The judge is not to “weigh the evidence or test its quality or reliability once a determination of its admissibility has been made”. Nor should the judge draw inferences of fact from the evidence before them. These functions are for the trier of fact, the jury.” [R v. Monteleone, 1987 CanLII 16 (SCC), at p.161, (S.C.C.)]. Hence, the judge does not weigh evidence, test the quality or reliability of admissible evidence or draw inferences of fact.

Other Questions


How has the trial judge reviewed the evidence at a jury trial? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the trial judge considered the totality of evidence at trial for impaired driving? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a trial judge have to detail every aspect of her decision if she prefers some evidence over other evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a trial judge required to review all the evidence at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the duty of an appellate court to reassess evidence at trial for the purpose of determining guilt or innocence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a genuine issue requiring a trial based on evidence filed without using Rule 20? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining whether an employer has led sufficient evidence to give rise to a practical evidentiary burden, what is the test for this type of evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a trial judge consider corroborating evidence in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is the order of a trial judge dispensing with a jury during the course of the trial consistently treated as an exercise of the exercise of his discretion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the role of a judge as a gatekeeper for expert evidence at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.