What is the legal test for a broad consensus?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Oakes v. Pahtayken, 2010 FCA 169 (CanLII):
The parties agreed that the Judge applied the correct legal test, that of broad consensus. The application of that test to the facts is a question of mixed fact and law for which the standard of review, once again, is that of palpable and overriding error: see Housen v. Nikolaisen, previously cited, at paragraph 36.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the legal standard for reviewing the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case? ("New York", United States of America)
What is the legal standard used by the courts to determine the correct legal standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning a conviction of an accused who is legally incompetent to stand trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal liability nature of a claim for legal malpractice? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal basis for a "legally sound" defense in drug trafficking cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for striking a motion where the affiant makes legal arguments and draws legal conclusions? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law supporting the proposition that "privation injustifiable" is as broad as that "préjudice abusif"? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the proper legal test for a summary dismissal of an appeal under subsection 53(1) of the DESD Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for a decision maker to exercise administrative powers without the proper legal authority? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the legal test for separation of property between a husband and wife? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
