When will a party be required to produce an affidavit of documents?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2016 BCSC 1870 (CanLII):

In NMH Holdings Limited v. The Crestmark Developments Limited Partnership, 2012 BCSC 2215, at para. 48, and following, Voith J. observed that the case law concerning the issue of when a party ought to be required to deliver an affidavit of documents might not be applicable to cases where the document production process is complicated and voluminous. He also noted that the case law had been developed under the former Rules. He questioned whether a requirement to produce a list of documents should any longer be thought of as containing a measure of censure.

Other Questions


What is the test for requiring a party to produce an affidavit verifying its list of documents? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the requirements for a party to produce all documents that are or have been in their possession or control and that could be used at trial to prove or disprove a material fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order that a party provide an affidavit verifying its list of documents when in the absence of any adequate explanation, relevant documents have been omitted from the list? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Minister of Justice required to produce a list of documents to be produced at the next stage of an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have parties been required to give express undertakings to make no improper use of disclosed documents? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party have an obligation to ensure that the signing party reads and understands the terms of a document? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party decline to attend for discovery if there has not been complete discovery of documents by both parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
When Baljit Singh swore his affidavit that the parties were not separated when Baljinder swore his May 4, 2015 affidavit, does he have to prove that they were separated? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.