In Matheos v. Pottle the issue was whether the defendant was entitled to a second examination by a doctor of physical rehabilitation in medicine when the defendant had already had the plaintiff examined by an occupational therapist and there was nothing in that report that appeared to dictate a further assessment. Again, that is not the situation here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.