How has the privative clause been dealt with?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Shuswap Lake Utilities Ltd. v. Mattison, 2006 BCSC 1546 (CanLII):
In my view, the issue of the privative clause has now been dealt with most recently by our Court of Appeal in Stark v. Vancouver School District No. 39, 2006 BCCA 124 [“Stark”]. This was an appeal from the decision of Ballance J., 2005 BCSC 931.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a privative clause exclude curial review of questions of law but not questions of jurisdiction? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts in B.C. dealt with the issue of improper handrails on a private bridge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a full privative clause in a workers’ compensation application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a full and true privative clause in workers’ compensation legislation of other provinces? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a privative clause sufficient to remove the judiciary's power to review actions and decisions of administrative bodies for compliance with the constitutional capacities of the government? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts dealt with family situations? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the requirements for private interest standing to bring a petition for declaratory relief? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining a private duty of care owed by a public authority? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts in BC dealt with the issue of proof of loss at the commencement of trial in a case where the loss had taken place as soon as practicable? (British Columbia, Canada)
