The context of and evidence in the proceeding was more than sufficient to raise the issue of good faith. This was clearly a situation where Aarti was being accused of conducting a so‑called “renoviction” by making an unusually long list of repairs after earlier failing to secure an increase in the rent by consent. In the context of this case, the Arbitrator needed to properly wrestle with the good faith issue which was central to the proceedings: Gallupe at para. 35; Gichuru v. Palmar Properties Inc., 2011 BCSC 827 at paras. 48–58.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.