Schachter v. Canada, 1992 CanLII 74 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 679 provides guidelines for a s. 52 analysis. Lamer C.J. explained that the phrase “to the extent of the inconsistency” could be interpreted to mean striking down legislation; striking down and temporarily suspending legislation; severing the legislation, which he also referred to as reading down the legislation; or reading in to the legislation. Determining which of the interpretations applies depends upon the provision in question. The over-arching principles of respect for the role of the legislature and respect for the purposes of the Charter guide the analysis.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.