I accept the point made in the Australian case of Lester-Travers v. Frankston, [1970] V.R. 2, in which Anderson J. stated at p. 9-10: I know of no basis on which it can be said that the interests of golfers, whether they be playing on a municipal golf course or any other kind of golf course, are superior to the right of the occupier of premises to the undisturbed use and enjoyment of such premises.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.