How have courts interpreted the Interest Act?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Paragon Capital Corporation Ltd. v. 395342 Alberta Ltd., 2004 ABQB 25 (CanLII):
In regards to the Interest Act, the legislation must be read as a whole in order to ascertain its aim and object: Thomson v. Canada (Agriculture) 1992 CanLII 121 (SCC), 1992 1 S.C.R. 385 at 398.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the provisions of section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a lack of guilty intent as an excuse for the publishing of an article by a newpaper when the material was prejudicial to the court proceedings? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of community of interest in municipal legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a fire insurance contract? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have any authority to transfer proceedings under R.12 from the Court of Appeal to the Superior Court? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the proviso in an accident insurance policy? (Alberta, Canada)
