What is the intention of the author and publisher of an offensive expression?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Casses v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2015 BCSC 2150 (CanLII):

The intention of the author and publisher is not relevant on the issue of meaning. The subjective opinion of a plaintiff concerning the meaning of the expression is also not relevant. See Lawson v. Baines, 2011 BCSC 326, at para. 39, aff’d 2012 BCCA 117. (I will refer to the trial decision as “Lawson v. Baines”.)

Other Questions


In assessing the credibility of an author, is the author’s credibility of the author? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the intention of the author and publisher of a statement alleged to be defamatory? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the authority of the Courts in common law jurisdictions to determine who has the authority to issue a notice of intent to sue? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to hold an oral hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party before the court be ordered to provide authorizations for the delivery of documents by the US tax authorities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to punitive damages for publishing an offensive and libellous statement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is freedom of expression a fundamental right of expression in a democratic society? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to overturn a conviction or sentence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for the authority of a local authority to enforce a ban on the sale and consumption of alcohol? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to issue a regulation which abrogates common law rights to justice and fairness? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.