Is there a presumption in common law that a person intends their actions?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from R v McLeod, 2011 SKPC 180 (CanLII):

There was a longstanding presumption in common law, now described as a reasonable inference which may be drawn, that a person intends the natural consequences of his actions (see reference to the inference in Seymour v. R. (1996), 1996 CanLII 201 (SCC), 106 C.C.C. (3d) 520 (S.C.C.)).

Other Questions


Can a person be added as a party in a personal injury action where the outcome of the action directly affects him? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a common law procedure act, 1854, ch. 125, which enacted that a plaintiff is not entitled to any costs in an action commenced after the action was commenced? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a prima facie cause of action in a personal injury action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is it actionable to induce or persuade another person not to enter into a contract with another person? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for common law common law spouses in common law relationships? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that if one person buys property but conveys it into another person's name or into his name, that other person becomes resulting trustee for the purchaser? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence a second action for damages arising out of the same circumstances? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for success in a personal injury action brought by a farmer who claims to have lost his right to land on his land? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for bringing a personal injury action against a former trustee? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for damages in a personal injury action brought by a defendant who failed to appear in court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.