An opposite result is found in Bourque v. Gerlach, [2006] B.C.J. No. 677 (CA). In that case, Rowles J.A. reversed the trial decision, which imputed income to a parent, because of the expert opinions from psychiatrists, including an independent examination, which confirmed that the parent suffered from long standing panic disorder, anxiety, and recurrent depression which was not amenable to treatment. In light of the substantial medical evidence, a link connecting the health needs to the inability to work had been made.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.