Can a continuing inability to practise law pending appeal prove irreparable harm?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Law Society of Upper Canada v. Steven James Vano, 2009 ONLSAP 16 (CanLII):

It is self-evident that, in some circumstances, the continuing inability to practise law pending appeal will evidence irreparable harm. For example, in Law Society of Upper Canada v. Kay, 2007 L.S.D.D. No. 14, at para. 15, the appeal panel stated:

Other Questions


Does filing materials and continuing litigation pending appeal constitute irreparable harm? (Ontario, Canada)
What are some cases where the Court of Appeal has found that a decision made by a party not to appeal against a decision not to grant leave to appeal is invalid? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a Master or Judge in chambers have the power to amend an Order of Appeal where the Master has appealed from the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts considered the issue of irreparable harm in an appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority to grant leave to appeal to appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test to prove that continuation of a support order would be continuation of the order if the support order is not inconsistent or absurd? (Ontario, Canada)
What is a "serious issue" in the context of a motion seeking a stay of an order pending appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the legal requirements for a stay pending appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party who entered into a will and continues to hold and continue as a devisee for life under a will that the testator seized? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the Minister’s appeal against the interim decision of the Court of Appeal finding that a new Formulary which includes the products of all five drug companies does not need to be included in the Formulaary? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.