Delay may bar a discretionary remedy, however one also usually looks to any resulting prejudice in order to waive the importance of the delay: see for example the application of this principle in Friends of The Oldman River Society v. Canada (Minister of Transport), 1992 CanLII 110 (SCC), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.) at 77 for an application of this principle. As I have said, there would be no real prejudice in granting the time extension.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.