What is the impact of the appearance of a witness in the assessment of credibility?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. A.E., 2017 ONSC 3464 (CanLII):

For my part, I have rarely found the demeanour of a witness to be an especially compelling factor in the assessment of credibility. The court of appeal has repeatedly cautioned against putting too much emphasis upon it. Any witness’ evidence must be assessed against the evidence as a whole. I think there is no better description of the process than that described by O’Halloran, J.A. in Faryna v. Chorny [1951], B.C.J. No. 129 (B.C.C.A.): If a trial Judge's finding of credibility is to depend solely on which person he thinks made the better appearance of sincerity in the witness box, we are left with a purely arbitrary finding and justice would then depend upon the best actors in the witness box. On reflection it becomes almost axiomatic that the appearance of telling the truth is but one of the elements that enter into the credibility of the evidence of a witness. Opportunities for knowledge, powers of observation, judgment and memory, ability to describe clearly what he has seen and heard, as well as other factors, combine to produce what is called credibility… A witness by his manner may create a very unfavourable impression of his truthfulness upon the trial Judge, and yet the surrounding circumstances in the case may point decisively to the conclusion that he is actually telling the truth. I am not referring to the comparatively infrequent cases in which a witness is caught in a clumsy lie. The credibility of interested witnesses, particularly in cases of conflict of evidence, cannot be gauged solely by the test of whether the personal demeanour of the particular witness carried conviction of the truth. The test must reasonably subject his story to an examination of its consistency with the probabilities that surround the currently existing conditions. In short, the real test of the truth of the story of a witness in such a case must be its harmony with the preponderance of the probabilities which a practical and informed person would readily recognize as reasonable in that place and in those conditions.

Other Questions


In assessing the demeanour of a witness, can a witness be distinguished from their physical appearance? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for assessing credibility of a witness? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for assessing the credibility of a witness? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a trial judge required to state that his view of the credibility of witnesses depended upon “the manner in which the witnesses were given or… their demeanour? (Ontario, Canada)
How to approach assessing the credibility of interested witnesses with diametrically opposed positions? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors will the court consider in assessing the credibility of a sexual assault complainant when assessing the timing of disclosure? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between the credibility of the witness and the judge? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for credibility in a witness case? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the doctrine of contemporaneous exposition apply to a contract where the contract states that the assessment contemplated was the assessment upon which taxes would be imposed in the next year? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a religious institution have to be assessed for purposes of assessment purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.