It is difficult to imagine that a flat or perfunctory denial of liability by a prospective defendant could have the impact of negating the discovery of a claim. Could it be different if the defendant went further and explained the circumstances in a way that convinced the plaintiff there was no cause of action? As determined by Mr. Justice Perell, the questions raised reflect the need for a trial to fully appreciate “the evidence and issues… required to make dispositive findings” (see: Combined Air Mechanical Services v. Flesch, supra, at para. 51).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.