What is the legal test for a motion for summary judgment?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hamilton v. Knight, 2015 MBQB 171 (CanLII):

[8] The definition of “a genuine issue for trial” was discussed by Karakatsanis J. in Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 at para. 49: 49 There will be no genuine issue requiring a trial when the judge is able to reach a fair and just determination on the merits on a motion for summary judgment. This will be the case when the process (1) allows the judge to make the necessary findings of fact, (2) allows the judge to apply the law to the facts, and (3) is a proportionate, more expeditious and less expensive means to achieve a just result. 50 These principles are interconnected and all speak to whether summary judgment will provide a fair and just adjudication. When a summary judgment motion allows the judge to find the necessary facts and resolve the dispute, proceeding to trial would generally not be proportionate, timely or cost effective. Similarly, a process that does not give a judge confidence in her conclusions can never be the proportionate way to resolve a dispute. It bears reiterating that the standard for fairness is not whether the procedure is as exhaustive as a trial, but whether it gives the judge confidence that she can find the necessary facts and apply the relevant legal principles so as to resolve the dispute. 60 The "interest of justice" inquiry goes further, and also considers the consequences of the motion in the context of the litigation as a whole. For example, if some of the claims against some of the parties will proceed to trial in any event, it may not be in the interest of justice to use the new fact-finding powers to grant summary judgment against a single defendant. Such partial summary judgment may run the risk of duplicative proceedings or inconsistent findings of fact and therefore the use of the powers may not be in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the resolution of an important claim against a key party could significantly advance access to justice, and be the most proportionate, timely and cost effective approach. PRICE PER ACRE

Other Questions


How have courts dealt with a husband's motion for summary judgment on a motion to invalidate a binding agreement? (Manitoba, Canada)
If a judgment is not a foreign judgment, can an estoppel be applied to an earlier judgment? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the effect of lay opinion evidence on a summary judgment motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
When will a motion for summary judgment not require a trial? (Manitoba, Canada)
What considerations must be considered in the context of a motion for summary judgment in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does a motion for summary judgment have to be dismissed? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a summary judgment be overturned on the basis of facts discovered after entry of the judgment? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a motion judge's decision not to interfere with the decision of the motion judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for summary judgment? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles to apply in the context of a motion by a plaintiff to have his case considered on the merits of the motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.